Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Alienware AW3225QF — 32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · Curved
Alienware

Alienware AW3225QF

32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · Curved

93
/ 100
From $1,199
VS
Alienware AW3225QF wins by 1
Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) — 49″ Dual-QHD · Curved · QD-OLED
Samsung

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

49″ Dual-QHD · Curved · QD-OLED

92
/ 100
From $2,199
Specdex verdict

Alienware AW3225QF takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Alienware AW3225QF lands at 93 and Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) at 92. That puts Alienware AW3225QF ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Alienware AW3225QF if…

  • ✓4K 240Hz QD-OLED
  • ✓Dolby Vision HDR
  • ✓Excellent HDR brightness for OLED

Pick Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) if…

  • ✓49″ ultrawide with QD-OLED
  • ✓1800R curve
  • ✓240 Hz native
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Picture quality

Alienware AW3225QF

Color accuracy and HDR performance

Alienware AW3225QF leads on hdr (94 vs 90).

Value for money

Alienware AW3225QF

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Alienware AW3225QF more score per dollar ($1,199 vs $2,199).

Alienware AW3225QF 93
vs
92 Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

Score breakdown

Alienware AW3225QF
93
color 96
motion 98
hdr 94
features 92
display 0
gaming 0
ergonomics 0
value 0
Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)
92
color 0
motion 95
hdr 90
features 0
display 95
gaming 96
ergonomics 80
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Alienware AW3225QF versus Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) — full spec comparison
Spec Alienware AW3225QF Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)
Panel
QD-OLED
—
Resolution
3840×2160
▲ 5120×1440
Refresh
240Hz
—
Connectivity
DP 1.4, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 90W
2× HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, USB hub
Display
—
49″ QD-OLED, 1800R
Refresh rate
—
240 Hz
HDR
—
DisplayHDR True Black 400

Alienware AW3225QF

Pros
  • +4K 240Hz QD-OLED
  • +Dolby Vision HDR
  • +Excellent HDR brightness for OLED
Cons
  • −Curve isn’t for everyone
  • −OLED burn-in risk
  • −Stand large

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

Pros
  • +49″ ultrawide with QD-OLED
  • +1800R curve
  • +240 Hz native
Cons
  • −Massive desk footprint
  • −No DisplayPort 2.1
  • −Auto-brightness limits HDR

FAQ: Alienware AW3225QF vs Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

Which is better, Alienware AW3225QF or Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)? +

Alienware AW3225QF scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Alienware AW3225QF worth the price? +

At $1,199, Alienware AW3225QF delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in motion.

Is Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) worth the price? +

At $2,199, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in gaming.

Does Alienware AW3225QF or Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for picture quality, Alienware AW3225QF or Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)? +

Alienware AW3225QF — leads on hdr (94 vs 90). Color accuracy and HDR performance.

Which is the better value, Alienware AW3225QF or Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)? +

Alienware AW3225QF — more score per dollar ($1,199 vs $2,199). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.