Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) — Gaming · 2023 · White
Beyerdynamic

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White)

Gaming · 2023 · White

88
/ 100
From $339
VS
Focal Celestee — Closed-back
Focal

Focal Celestee

Closed-back

88
/ 100
From $999
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) lands at 88 and Focal Celestee at 88. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) if…

  • ✓Low-latency 2.4 GHz wireless (most)
  • ✓Detachable broadcast mic
  • ✓Console compatibility

Pick Focal Celestee if…

  • ✓Reference-level detail
  • ✓Well-regarded in audiophile community
  • ✓Long-term ownership appeal
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sound quality

Tie

Tuning, detail, and staging

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Noise cancelling

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White)

ANC strength for commute and travel

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) leads on anc (70 vs 0).

Comfort

Focal Celestee

Long-session wearability

Focal Celestee leads on comfort (88 vs 86).

Value for money

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White)

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) more score per dollar ($339 vs $999).

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) 88
vs
88 Focal Celestee

Score breakdown

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White)
88
anc 70
sound 88
comfort 86
battery 86
features 88
Focal Celestee
88
anc 0
sound 88
comfort 88
battery 100
features 50

Specs side-by-side

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) versus Focal Celestee — full spec comparison
Spec Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) Focal Celestee
Type
Gaming headset
Closed-back
Variant
White
—
Release year
2023
—

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White)

Pros
  • +Low-latency 2.4 GHz wireless (most)
  • +Detachable broadcast mic
  • +Console compatibility
Cons
  • −Bulkier than audiophile cans
  • −Game-tuned EQ
  • −Software required on PC

Focal Celestee

Pros
  • +Reference-level detail
  • +Well-regarded in audiophile community
  • +Long-term ownership appeal
Cons
  • −Requires amplifier (most)
  • −No active noise cancellation
  • −Impractical for commuting

FAQ: Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) vs Focal Celestee

Which is better, Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) or Focal Celestee? +

Both score 88 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) worth the price? +

At $339, Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in sound.

Is Focal Celestee worth the price? +

At $999, Focal Celestee delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in battery.

Does Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) or Focal Celestee last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for noise cancelling, Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) or Focal Celestee? +

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) — leads on anc (70 vs 0). ANC strength for commute and travel.

Which is better for comfort, Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro (White) or Focal Celestee? +

Focal Celestee — leads on comfort (88 vs 86). Long-session wearability.