Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Canon 5D Mark III — full-frame DSLR · 2012
Canon

Canon 5D Mark III

full-frame DSLR · 2012

78
/ 100
From $3,499
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 17
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Canon 5D Mark III lands at 78 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II at 95. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 17 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Canon 5D Mark III if…

  • Mature system, great used market
  • Proven lens lineup
  • Often on sale

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Ergonomics

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on ergonomics (92 vs 86).

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (96 vs 78).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (98 vs 74).

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Canon 5D Mark III 78
vs
95 Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Score breakdown

Canon 5D Mark III
78
photo 78
video 70
autofocus 74
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92

Specs side-by-side

Canon 5D Mark III versus Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full spec comparison
Spec Canon 5D Mark III Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Format
full-frame DSLR
Release year
2012
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS

Canon 5D Mark III

Pros
  • +Mature system, great used market
  • +Proven lens lineup
  • +Often on sale
Cons
  • Older AF system
  • Heavier than modern mirrorless
  • Firmware updates trailed off

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

FAQ: Canon 5D Mark III vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Which is better, Canon 5D Mark III or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 17. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Canon 5D Mark III worth the price? +

At $3,499, Canon 5D Mark III delivers a Specdex score of 78 — strongest in ergonomics.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Does Canon 5D Mark III or Canon EOS R5 Mark II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for ergonomics, Canon 5D Mark III or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on ergonomics (92 vs 86). Compared on the ergonomics sub-score.

Which is better for photo, Canon 5D Mark III or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (96 vs 78). Compared on the photo sub-score.