Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Fujifilm X-Pro3 — APS-C rangefinder · 2019
Fujifilm

Fujifilm X-Pro3

APS-C rangefinder · 2019

86
/ 100
From $1,799
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 9
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Fujifilm X-Pro3 lands at 86 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II at 95. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 9 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Fujifilm X-Pro3 if…

  • Mature system, great used market
  • Proven lens lineup
  • Often on sale

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (96 vs 86).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (98 vs 82).

Ergonomics

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on ergonomics (92 vs 86).

Value for money

Fujifilm X-Pro3

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Fujifilm X-Pro3 more score per dollar ($1,799 vs $4,299).

Fujifilm X-Pro3 86
vs
95 Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Score breakdown

Fujifilm X-Pro3
86
photo 86
video 78
autofocus 82
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92

Specs side-by-side

Fujifilm X-Pro3 versus Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full spec comparison
Spec Fujifilm X-Pro3 Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Format
APS-C rangefinder
Release year
2019
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS

Fujifilm X-Pro3

Pros
  • +Mature system, great used market
  • +Proven lens lineup
  • +Often on sale
Cons
  • Older AF system
  • Heavier than modern mirrorless
  • Firmware updates trailed off

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

FAQ: Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Which is better, Fujifilm X-Pro3 or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 9. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Fujifilm X-Pro3 worth the price? +

At $1,799, Fujifilm X-Pro3 delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in photo.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Does Fujifilm X-Pro3 or Canon EOS R5 Mark II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Fujifilm X-Pro3 or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (96 vs 86). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Fujifilm X-Pro3 or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on autofocus (98 vs 82). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.