Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM — Snapdragon 8 Elite · One UI · 128GB · Natural · Red · Physical SIM
Samsung

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM

Snapdragon 8 Elite · One UI · 128GB · Natural · Red · Physical SIM

88
/ 100
From $799
VS
iPhone 16 Plus 512GB — A18 · iOS · 512GB
Apple

iPhone 16 Plus 512GB

A18 · iOS · 512GB

88
/ 100
From $1,099
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM lands at 88 and iPhone 16 Plus 512GB at 88. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM if…

  • ✓Large AMOLED display
  • ✓S-Pen or DeX productivity (on Ultra/Note)
  • ✓Many storage tiers

Pick iPhone 16 Plus 512GB if…

  • ✓iOS ecosystem
  • ✓Long update support
  • ✓Polished hardware
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photography

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM

Stills and video quality across lenses

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM leads on camera (90 vs 87).

Battery life

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM

Screen-on time and charging

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM leads on battery (84 vs 82).

Performance

Tie

Chipset speed for gaming and heavy apps

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Display

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM

Panel quality, brightness, refresh rate

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM leads on display (90 vs 85).

Value for money

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM more score per dollar ($799 vs $1,099).

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM 88
vs
88 iPhone 16 Plus 512GB

Score breakdown

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM
88
cpu 88
gpu 87
camera 90
battery 84
display 90
design 87
iPhone 16 Plus 512GB
88
cpu 88
gpu 86
camera 87
battery 82
display 85
design 88

Specs side-by-side

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM versus iPhone 16 Plus 512GB — full spec comparison
Spec Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM iPhone 16 Plus 512GB
Chipset
Snapdragon 8 Elite
A18
Storage
128GB
▲ 512GB
OS
Android 15
iOS 18
Release year
2025
2024

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM

Pros
  • +Large AMOLED display
  • +S-Pen or DeX productivity (on Ultra/Note)
  • +Many storage tiers
Cons
  • −One UI can be heavy
  • −Pricey top trims
  • −Update speed trails Pixel

iPhone 16 Plus 512GB

Pros
  • +iOS ecosystem
  • +Long update support
  • +Polished hardware
Cons
  • −Premium pricing
  • −Limited customization
  • −Lightning/USB-C split across generations

FAQ: Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM vs iPhone 16 Plus 512GB

Which is better, Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM or iPhone 16 Plus 512GB? +

Both score 88 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM worth the price? +

At $799, Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in camera.

Is iPhone 16 Plus 512GB worth the price? +

At $1,099, iPhone 16 Plus 512GB delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in cpu.

Does Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM or iPhone 16 Plus 512GB last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photography, Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM or iPhone 16 Plus 512GB? +

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM — leads on camera (90 vs 87). Stills and video quality across lenses.

Which is better for battery life, Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM or iPhone 16 Plus 512GB? +

Galaxy S25 128GB (Natural) · Red · Physical SIM — leads on battery (84 vs 82). Screen-on time and charging.