Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) — Wi-Fi 6 · OpenWrt · 2.5 GbE × 5
GL.iNet

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Wi-Fi 6 · OpenWrt · 2.5 GbE × 5

87
/ 100
From $199
VS
Ubiquiti Dream Router wins by 1
Ubiquiti Dream Router — Wi-Fi 6 · AX5400
Ubiquiti

Ubiquiti Dream Router

Wi-Fi 6 · AX5400

88
/ 100
From $199
Specdex verdict

Ubiquiti Dream Router takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) lands at 87 and Ubiquiti Dream Router at 88. That puts Ubiquiti Dream Router ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) if…

  • ✓Native OpenWrt with GL.iNet polish
  • ✓5× 2.5 GbE ports
  • ✓Tailscale + WireGuard built-in

Pick Ubiquiti Dream Router if…

  • ✓Current-gen Wi-Fi
  • ✓App-driven setup
  • ✓Parental controls (brand-dependent)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Features

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Compared on the features sub-score

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) leads on features (96 vs 86).

Throughput

Tie

Compared on the throughput sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Range

Tie

Compared on the range sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) 87
vs
88 Ubiquiti Dream Router

Score breakdown

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)
87
throughput 88
range 86
features 96
ease 84
value 0
Ubiquiti Dream Router
88
throughput 88
range 86
features 86
ease 0
value 82

Specs side-by-side

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) versus Ubiquiti Dream Router — full spec comparison
Spec GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) Ubiquiti Dream Router
Standard
Wi-Fi 6 dual-band
Wi-Fi 6
Total bandwidth
5400 Mbps
—
WAN
2.5 GbE
—
LAN
4× 2.5 GbE
—
USB
1× USB 3.0
—
Coverage
~3000 sq ft
—
Throughput
—
AX5400

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Pros
  • +Native OpenWrt with GL.iNet polish
  • +5× 2.5 GbE ports
  • +Tailscale + WireGuard built-in
Cons
  • −Wi-Fi 6 (not 7) at this price
  • −Limited 6 GHz support
  • −Setup steeper than eero

Ubiquiti Dream Router

Pros
  • +Current-gen Wi-Fi
  • +App-driven setup
  • +Parental controls (brand-dependent)
Cons
  • −Advanced features sometimes subscription-gated
  • −Range varies
  • −Firmware stability improves over time

FAQ: GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) vs Ubiquiti Dream Router

Which is better, GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) or Ubiquiti Dream Router? +

Ubiquiti Dream Router scores 88 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) worth the price? +

At $199, GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in features.

Is Ubiquiti Dream Router worth the price? +

At $199, Ubiquiti Dream Router delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in throughput.

Does GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) or Ubiquiti Dream Router last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for features, GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) or Ubiquiti Dream Router? +

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) — leads on features (96 vs 86). Compared on the features sub-score.