Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz
Intel

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz

93
/ 100
From $649
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K wins by 4
Core i9-14900K — Raptor Lake Refresh · 24C/32T · 125 W · LGA1700
Intel

Core i9-14900K

Raptor Lake Refresh · 24C/32T · 125 W · LGA1700

89
/ 100
From $589
Specdex verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K lands at 93 and Core i9-14900K at 89. That puts Intel Core Ultra 9 395K ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Intel Core Ultra 9 395K if…

  • Latest generation silicon
  • Improved perf-per-watt
  • Full modern feature set

Pick Core i9-14900K if…

  • Strong per-core performance
  • Hybrid P/E cores (12th gen+)
  • Wide platform availability
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on gaming (94 vs 88).

Creators & productivity

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on multi (93 vs 89).

Power efficiency

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on efficiency (86 vs 81).

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K 93
vs
89 Core i9-14900K

Score breakdown

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K
93
single 95
multi 93
gaming 94
efficiency 86
Core i9-14900K
89
single 91
multi 89
gaming 88
efficiency 81

Specs side-by-side

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K versus Core i9-14900K — full spec comparison
Spec Intel Core Ultra 9 395K Core i9-14900K
Architecture
Panther Lake
Raptor Lake Refresh
Cores
26 (8P+16E+2LP)
24
Threads
26
32
Socket
LGA1851
LGA1700
Release year
2025
2023
TDP
125 W

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Pros
  • +Latest generation silicon
  • +Improved perf-per-watt
  • +Full modern feature set
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Requires up-to-date platform
  • Initial stock scarcity likely

Core i9-14900K

Pros
  • +Strong per-core performance
  • +Hybrid P/E cores (12th gen+)
  • +Wide platform availability
Cons
  • Power draw on top SKUs
  • Frequent socket changes
  • Arrow Lake gaming regressions

FAQ: Intel Core Ultra 9 395K vs Core i9-14900K

Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Core i9-14900K? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Intel Core Ultra 9 395K worth the price? +

At $649, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in single.

Is Core i9-14900K worth the price? +

At $589, Core i9-14900K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in single.

Does Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Core i9-14900K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Core i9-14900K? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on gaming (94 vs 88). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for creator and productivity work, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Core i9-14900K? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on multi (93 vs 89). Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count.