Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Leica M10 — full-frame rangefinder · 2017
Leica

Leica M10

full-frame rangefinder · 2017

90
/ 100
From $7,195
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only wins by 5
Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only — full-frame · 2024
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only

full-frame · 2024

95
/ 100
From $4,299
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Leica M10 lands at 90 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only at 95. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only ahead by 5 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Leica M10 if…

  • Mature system, great used market
  • Proven lens lineup
  • Often on sale

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only leads on photo (95 vs 90).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only leads on autofocus (93 vs 86).

Video

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only

Compared on the video sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only leads on video (91 vs 82).

Value for money

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only more score per dollar ($4,299 vs $7,195).

Leica M10 90
vs
95 Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only

Score breakdown

Leica M10
90
photo 90
video 82
autofocus 86
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only
95
photo 95
video 91
autofocus 93
ergonomics 86

Specs side-by-side

Leica M10 versus Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only — full spec comparison
Spec Leica M10 Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only
Format
full-frame rangefinder
full-frame
Release year
2017
2024

Leica M10

Pros
  • +Mature system, great used market
  • +Proven lens lineup
  • +Often on sale
Cons
  • Older AF system
  • Heavier than modern mirrorless
  • Firmware updates trailed off

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

FAQ: Leica M10 vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only

Which is better, Leica M10 or Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 5. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Leica M10 worth the price? +

At $7,195, Leica M10 delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in photo.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in photo.

Does Leica M10 or Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Leica M10 or Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only — leads on photo (95 vs 90). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Leica M10 or Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II · Body only — leads on autofocus (93 vs 86). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.