Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Prime/Zoom

95
/ 100
From $2,699
VS
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S wins by 2
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art — L/E mount · Constant f/2.8 · 745g
Sigma

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

L/E mount · Constant f/2.8 · 745g

93
/ 100
From $1,099
Specdex verdict

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S lands at 95 and Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art at 93. That puts Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics

Pick Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art if…

  • ✓Sharper than first-party Sony GM at 1/3 the price
  • ✓Aperture ring with click toggle
  • ✓Weather-sealed
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Tie

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads on af (94 vs 92).

Build

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Compared on the build sub-score

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads on build (94 vs 92).

Value for money

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art more score per dollar ($1,099 vs $2,699).

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S 95
vs
93 Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
95
sharpness 95
af 94
build 94
value 84
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art
93
sharpness 95
af 92
build 92
value 95

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S versus Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art
Mount
—
L-Mount + Sony E
Focal length
—
24-70 mm
Aperture
—
f/2.8
Construction
—
19 elements / 15 groups
Min focus
—
0.18 m
Filter
—
82 mm
Weight
—
745 g

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Pros
  • +Sharper than first-party Sony GM at 1/3 the price
  • +Aperture ring with click toggle
  • +Weather-sealed
Cons
  • −Heavier than Sony GM II
  • −Not stabilized — relies on body IBIS
  • −Hood plastic

FAQ: Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S vs Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Which is better, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S worth the price? +

At $2,699, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art worth the price? +

At $1,099, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for autofocus, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — leads on af (94 vs 92). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.

Which is better for build, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — leads on build (94 vs 92). Compared on the build sub-score.