Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit — Micro Four Thirds · 2024
OM System

OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit

Micro Four Thirds · 2024

87
/ 100
From $2,549
VS
Sony A7S III · Body only wins by 4
Sony A7S III · Body only — full-frame · 2020
Sony

Sony A7S III · Body only

full-frame · 2020

91
/ 100
From $3,498
Specdex verdict

Sony A7S III · Body only takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit lands at 87 and Sony A7S III · Body only at 91. That puts Sony A7S III · Body only ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance

Pick Sony A7S III · Body only if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Sony A7S III · Body only

Compared on the photo sub-score

Sony A7S III · Body only leads on photo (91 vs 87).

Autofocus

Sony A7S III · Body only

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Sony A7S III · Body only leads on autofocus (89 vs 85).

Ergonomics

Tie

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit more score per dollar ($2,549 vs $3,498).

OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit 87
vs
91 Sony A7S III · Body only

Score breakdown

OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit
87
photo 87
video 83
autofocus 85
ergonomics 86
Sony A7S III · Body only
91
photo 91
video 87
autofocus 89
ergonomics 86

Specs side-by-side

OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit versus Sony A7S III · Body only — full spec comparison
Spec OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit Sony A7S III · Body only
Format
Micro Four Thirds
full-frame
Release year
2024
2020

OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

Sony A7S III · Body only

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

FAQ: OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit vs Sony A7S III · Body only

Which is better, OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit or Sony A7S III · Body only? +

Sony A7S III · Body only scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit worth the price? +

At $2,549, OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in photo.

Is Sony A7S III · Body only worth the price? +

At $3,498, Sony A7S III · Body only delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in photo.

Does OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit or Sony A7S III · Body only last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit or Sony A7S III · Body only? +

Sony A7S III · Body only — leads on photo (91 vs 87). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, OM System OM-1 Mark II · with dual-battery kit or Sony A7S III · Body only? +

Sony A7S III · Body only — leads on autofocus (89 vs 85). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.