Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 — RDNA 3 · 16 GB GDDR6 · 190 W · Nitro+
Sapphire

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700

RDNA 3 · 16 GB GDDR6 · 190 W · Nitro+

82
/ 100
From $1,128
VS
GeForce RTX 5090 wins by 16
GeForce RTX 5090 — Blackwell · 32 GB GDDR7 · 575 W
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 5090

Blackwell · 32 GB GDDR7 · 575 W

98
/ 100
From $1,999
Specdex verdict

GeForce RTX 5090 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 lands at 82 and GeForce RTX 5090 at 98. That puts GeForce RTX 5090 ahead by 16 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 if…

  • ECC VRAM for professional workloads
  • ISV certifications
  • Huge framebuffer

Pick GeForce RTX 5090 if…

  • Unrivaled 4K and path-tracing
  • DLSS 4 Multi-Frame Gen
  • 32 GB VRAM for AI
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

4K & rasterization

GeForce RTX 5090

Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution

GeForce RTX 5090 leads on raster (100 vs 77).

Ray tracing

GeForce RTX 5090

RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting

GeForce RTX 5090 leads on rt (100 vs 82).

AI workloads

GeForce RTX 5090

Local inference, upscaling, generative tools

GeForce RTX 5090 leads on ai (100 vs 83).

Power efficiency

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700

Frames per watt — heat, noise, and PSU sizing

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 leads on efficiency (85 vs 78).

Value for money

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 more score per dollar ($1,128 vs $1,999).

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 82
vs
98 GeForce RTX 5090

Score breakdown

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700
82
raster 77
rt 82
ai 83
efficiency 85
GeForce RTX 5090
98
raster 100
rt 100
ai 100
efficiency 78

Specs side-by-side

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 versus GeForce RTX 5090 — full spec comparison
Spec Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 GeForce RTX 5090
Architecture
RDNA 3
Blackwell
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
32 GB GDDR7
TBP
190 W
575 W
Release year
2023
CUDA cores
21,760
Tensor cores
680 (5th gen)
RT cores
170 (4th gen)
Memory bus
512-bit
Bandwidth
1792 GB/s
PCIe
PCIe 5.0 x16

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700

Pros
  • +ECC VRAM for professional workloads
  • +ISV certifications
  • +Huge framebuffer
Cons
  • Expensive per-frame vs consumer
  • Lower gaming clocks
  • Driver optimized for CAD/DCC not games

GeForce RTX 5090

Pros
  • +Unrivaled 4K and path-tracing
  • +DLSS 4 Multi-Frame Gen
  • +32 GB VRAM for AI
Cons
  • Enormous power draw
  • Two-slot+ cooler required
  • Scarce MSRP supply

FAQ: Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 vs GeForce RTX 5090

Which is better, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 or GeForce RTX 5090? +

GeForce RTX 5090 scores 98 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 16. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 worth the price? +

At $1,128, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 delivers a Specdex score of 82 — strongest in efficiency.

Is GeForce RTX 5090 worth the price? +

At $1,999, GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a Specdex score of 98 — strongest in raster.

Does Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 or GeForce RTX 5090 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for 4K gaming, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 or GeForce RTX 5090? +

GeForce RTX 5090 — leads on raster (100 vs 77). Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution.

Which is better for ray tracing, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon Pro W7700 or GeForce RTX 5090? +

GeForce RTX 5090 — leads on rt (100 vs 82). RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting.