Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Ricoh GR IIIx — APS-C compact · 2021
Ricoh

Ricoh GR IIIx

APS-C compact · 2021

87
/ 100
From $999
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 8
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Ricoh GR IIIx lands at 87 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II at 95. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 8 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Ricoh GR IIIx if…

  • Mature system, great used market
  • Proven lens lineup
  • Often on sale

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (96 vs 87).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (98 vs 83).

Ergonomics

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on ergonomics (92 vs 86).

Value for money

Ricoh GR IIIx

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Ricoh GR IIIx more score per dollar ($999 vs $4,299).

Ricoh GR IIIx 87
vs
95 Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Score breakdown

Ricoh GR IIIx
87
photo 87
video 79
autofocus 83
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92

Specs side-by-side

Ricoh GR IIIx versus Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full spec comparison
Spec Ricoh GR IIIx Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Format
APS-C compact
Release year
2021
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS

Ricoh GR IIIx

Pros
  • +Mature system, great used market
  • +Proven lens lineup
  • +Often on sale
Cons
  • Older AF system
  • Heavier than modern mirrorless
  • Firmware updates trailed off

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

FAQ: Ricoh GR IIIx vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Which is better, Ricoh GR IIIx or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 8. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Ricoh GR IIIx worth the price? +

At $999, Ricoh GR IIIx delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in photo.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Does Ricoh GR IIIx or Canon EOS R5 Mark II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Ricoh GR IIIx or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (96 vs 87). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Ricoh GR IIIx or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on autofocus (98 vs 83). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.