Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit — APS-C compact · 2021
Ricoh

Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit

APS-C compact · 2021

87
/ 100
From $2,199
VS
Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only wins by 4
Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only — APS-C · 2022
Fujifilm

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only

APS-C · 2022

91
/ 100
From $1,999
Specdex verdict

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit lands at 87 and Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only at 91. That puts Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit if…

  • ✓Mature system, great used market
  • ✓Proven lens lineup
  • ✓Often on sale

Pick Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only if…

  • ✓Current-gen AF system
  • ✓Proven lens ecosystem
  • ✓Strong video + stills balance
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only

Compared on the photo sub-score

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only leads on photo (91 vs 87).

Autofocus

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only leads on autofocus (89 vs 83).

Ergonomics

Tie

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only more score per dollar ($1,999 vs $2,199).

Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit 87
vs
91 Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only

Score breakdown

Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit
87
photo 87
video 79
autofocus 83
ergonomics 86
Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only
91
photo 91
video 87
autofocus 89
ergonomics 86

Specs side-by-side

Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit versus Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only — full spec comparison
Spec Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only
Format
APS-C compact
APS-C
Release year
2021
2022

Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit

Pros
  • +Mature system, great used market
  • +Proven lens lineup
  • +Often on sale
Cons
  • −Older AF system
  • −Heavier than modern mirrorless
  • −Firmware updates trailed off

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • −Body price excludes lens
  • −Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • −Learning curve on menus

FAQ: Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit vs Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only

Which is better, Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit or Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only? +

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit worth the price? +

At $2,199, Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in photo.

Is Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only worth the price? +

At $1,999, Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in photo.

Does Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit or Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit or Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only? +

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only — leads on photo (91 vs 87). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Ricoh GR IIIx · with 24-70mm kit or Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only? +

Fujifilm X-H2 · Body only — leads on autofocus (89 vs 83). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.