Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) — 49″ Dual-QHD · Curved · QD-OLED
Samsung

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

49″ Dual-QHD · Curved · QD-OLED

92
/ 100
From $2,199
VS
Alienware AW3225QF wins by 1
Alienware AW3225QF — 32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · Curved
Alienware

Alienware AW3225QF

32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · Curved

93
/ 100
From $1,199
Specdex verdict

Alienware AW3225QF takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) lands at 92 and Alienware AW3225QF at 93. That puts Alienware AW3225QF ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) if…

  • ✓49″ ultrawide with QD-OLED
  • ✓1800R curve
  • ✓240 Hz native

Pick Alienware AW3225QF if…

  • ✓4K 240Hz QD-OLED
  • ✓Dolby Vision HDR
  • ✓Excellent HDR brightness for OLED
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Picture quality

Alienware AW3225QF

Color accuracy and HDR performance

Alienware AW3225QF leads on hdr (94 vs 90).

Value for money

Alienware AW3225QF

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Alienware AW3225QF more score per dollar ($1,199 vs $2,199).

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) 92
vs
93 Alienware AW3225QF

Score breakdown

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)
92
display 95
motion 95
hdr 90
gaming 96
ergonomics 80
value 84
color 0
features 0
Alienware AW3225QF
93
display 0
motion 98
hdr 94
gaming 0
ergonomics 0
value 0
color 96
features 92

Specs side-by-side

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) versus Alienware AW3225QF — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) Alienware AW3225QF
Display
49″ QD-OLED, 1800R
—
Resolution
▲ 5120×1440
3840×2160
Refresh rate
240 Hz
—
HDR
DisplayHDR True Black 400
—
Connectivity
2× HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, USB hub
DP 1.4, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 90W
Panel
—
QD-OLED
Refresh
—
240Hz

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

Pros
  • +49″ ultrawide with QD-OLED
  • +1800R curve
  • +240 Hz native
Cons
  • −Massive desk footprint
  • −No DisplayPort 2.1
  • −Auto-brightness limits HDR

Alienware AW3225QF

Pros
  • +4K 240Hz QD-OLED
  • +Dolby Vision HDR
  • +Excellent HDR brightness for OLED
Cons
  • −Curve isn’t for everyone
  • −OLED burn-in risk
  • −Stand large

FAQ: Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) vs Alienware AW3225QF

Which is better, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) or Alienware AW3225QF? +

Alienware AW3225QF scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) worth the price? +

At $2,199, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in gaming.

Is Alienware AW3225QF worth the price? +

At $1,199, Alienware AW3225QF delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in motion.

Does Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) or Alienware AW3225QF last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for picture quality, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) or Alienware AW3225QF? +

Alienware AW3225QF — leads on hdr (94 vs 90). Color accuracy and HDR performance.

Which is the better value, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) or Alienware AW3225QF? +

Alienware AW3225QF — more score per dollar ($1,199 vs $2,199). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.