Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) — 49″ Dual-QHD · Curved · QD-OLED
Samsung

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

49″ Dual-QHD · Curved · QD-OLED

92
/ 100
From $2,199
VS
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM wins by 3
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM — 32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · DisplayPort 2.1
ASUS

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · DisplayPort 2.1

95
/ 100
From $1,299
Specdex verdict

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) lands at 92 and ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM at 95. That puts ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) if…

  • ✓49″ ultrawide with QD-OLED
  • ✓1800R curve
  • ✓240 Hz native

Pick ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM if…

  • ✓4K 240Hz OLED
  • ✓DP 2.1 UHBR20
  • ✓Excellent HDR
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Picture quality

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Color accuracy and HDR performance

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM leads on hdr (94 vs 90).

Value for money

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM more score per dollar ($1,299 vs $2,199).

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) 92
vs
95 ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Score breakdown

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)
92
display 95
motion 95
hdr 90
gaming 96
ergonomics 80
value 84
color 0
features 0
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM
95
display 0
motion 98
hdr 94
gaming 0
ergonomics 0
value 0
color 96
features 94

Specs side-by-side

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) versus ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM
Display
49″ QD-OLED, 1800R
—
Resolution
▲ 5120×1440
3840×2160
Refresh rate
240 Hz
—
HDR
DisplayHDR True Black 400
—
Connectivity
2× HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, USB hub
DP 2.1, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 90W PD
Panel
—
QD-OLED
Refresh
—
240Hz
Response time
—
0.03 ms GtG

Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD)

Pros
  • +49″ ultrawide with QD-OLED
  • +1800R curve
  • +240 Hz native
Cons
  • −Massive desk footprint
  • −No DisplayPort 2.1
  • −Auto-brightness limits HDR

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Pros
  • +4K 240Hz OLED
  • +DP 2.1 UHBR20
  • +Excellent HDR
Cons
  • −Burn-in risk (mitigated)
  • −Expensive
  • −OLED pixel-shift artifacts

FAQ: Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) vs ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Which is better, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) or ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM? +

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) worth the price? +

At $2,199, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in gaming.

Is ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM worth the price? +

At $1,299, ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in motion.

Does Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) or ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for picture quality, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) or ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM? +

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM — leads on hdr (94 vs 90). Color accuracy and HDR performance.

Which is the better value, Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SD) or ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM? +

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM — more score per dollar ($1,299 vs $2,199). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.