Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung S95F OLED — QD-OLED Gen 4 · ~2,100 nits · 165 Hz
Samsung

Samsung S95F OLED

QD-OLED Gen 4 · ~2,100 nits · 165 Hz

94
/ 100
From $3,499
VS
Samsung S95D 83" wins by 1
Samsung S95D 83" — QD-OLED · 83" · 2024
Samsung

Samsung S95D 83"

QD-OLED · 83" · 2024

95
/ 100
From $5,948
Specdex verdict

Samsung S95D 83" takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung S95F OLED lands at 94 and Samsung S95D 83" at 95. That puts Samsung S95D 83" ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung S95F OLED if…

  • QD-OLED Gen 4 with ~2,100 nit peak (RTINGS measured)
  • 165 Hz with full HDMI 2.1
  • OneConnect Box keeps panel thin

Pick Samsung S95D 83" if…

  • Strong HDR performance
  • Current smart platform
  • HDMI 2.1 on most HDMI ports
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Samsung S95F OLED

Input lag, VRR, 120 Hz support

Samsung S95F OLED leads on gaming (96 vs 91).

Smart platform

Samsung S95D 83"

OS speed, app support, ecosystem

Samsung S95D 83" leads on smart (82 vs 80).

Value for money

Samsung S95F OLED

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung S95F OLED more score per dollar ($3,499 vs $5,948).

Samsung S95F OLED 94
vs
95 Samsung S95D 83"

Score breakdown

Samsung S95F OLED
94
display 95
motion 96
hdr 92
gaming 96
smart 80
picture 0
sound 0
Samsung S95D 83"
95
display 0
motion 93
hdr 0
gaming 91
smart 82
picture 95
sound 78

Specs side-by-side

Samsung S95F OLED versus Samsung S95D 83" — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung S95F OLED Samsung S95D 83"
Display
55″ / 65″ / 77″ QD-OLED Gen 4
Resolution
4K @ 165 Hz
Peak brightness
~2,100 nits (RTINGS measured 10% window)
HDR
HDR10+ + HDR10
HDMI
4× HDMI 2.1
VRR
Yes
ALLM
Yes
Panel
QD-OLED
Size
83"
Refresh
120Hz
Release year
2024

Samsung S95F OLED

Pros
  • +QD-OLED Gen 4 with ~2,100 nit peak (RTINGS measured)
  • +165 Hz with full HDMI 2.1
  • +OneConnect Box keeps panel thin
Cons
  • No Dolby Vision (HDR10+ only)
  • Tizen OS slower than LG webOS
  • Expensive at 65″+

Samsung S95D 83"

Pros
  • +Strong HDR performance
  • +Current smart platform
  • +HDMI 2.1 on most HDMI ports
Cons
  • Ads on smart platform
  • Sound trails dedicated audio
  • Large footprint

FAQ: Samsung S95F OLED vs Samsung S95D 83"

Which is better, Samsung S95F OLED or Samsung S95D 83"? +

Samsung S95D 83" scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung S95F OLED worth the price? +

At $3,499, Samsung S95F OLED delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in motion.

Is Samsung S95D 83" worth the price? +

At $5,948, Samsung S95D 83" delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in picture.

Does Samsung S95F OLED or Samsung S95D 83" last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Samsung S95F OLED or Samsung S95D 83"? +

Samsung S95F OLED — leads on gaming (96 vs 91). Input lag, VRR, 120 Hz support.

Which is better for smart platform, Samsung S95F OLED or Samsung S95D 83"? +

Samsung S95D 83" — leads on smart (82 vs 80). OS speed, app support, ecosystem.