Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung S95F OLED — QD-OLED Gen 4 · ~2,100 nits · 165 Hz
Samsung

Samsung S95F OLED

QD-OLED Gen 4 · ~2,100 nits · 165 Hz

94
/ 100
From $3,499
VS
Sony BRAVIA 9 65" wins by 1
Sony BRAVIA 9 65" — Mini-LED · 65" · 2024
Sony

Sony BRAVIA 9 65"

Mini-LED · 65" · 2024

95
/ 100
From $6,874
Specdex verdict

Sony BRAVIA 9 65" takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung S95F OLED lands at 94 and Sony BRAVIA 9 65" at 95. That puts Sony BRAVIA 9 65" ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung S95F OLED if…

  • QD-OLED Gen 4 with ~2,100 nit peak (RTINGS measured)
  • 165 Hz with full HDMI 2.1
  • OneConnect Box keeps panel thin

Pick Sony BRAVIA 9 65" if…

  • Strong HDR performance
  • Current smart platform
  • HDMI 2.1 on most HDMI ports
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Samsung S95F OLED

Input lag, VRR, 120 Hz support

Samsung S95F OLED leads on gaming (96 vs 91).

Smart platform

Sony BRAVIA 9 65"

OS speed, app support, ecosystem

Sony BRAVIA 9 65" leads on smart (82 vs 80).

Value for money

Samsung S95F OLED

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung S95F OLED more score per dollar ($3,499 vs $6,874).

Samsung S95F OLED 94
vs
95 Sony BRAVIA 9 65"

Score breakdown

Samsung S95F OLED
94
display 95
motion 96
hdr 92
gaming 96
smart 80
picture 0
sound 0
Sony BRAVIA 9 65"
95
display 0
motion 93
hdr 0
gaming 91
smart 82
picture 95
sound 78

Specs side-by-side

Samsung S95F OLED versus Sony BRAVIA 9 65" — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung S95F OLED Sony BRAVIA 9 65"
Display
55″ / 65″ / 77″ QD-OLED Gen 4
Resolution
4K @ 165 Hz
Peak brightness
~2,100 nits (RTINGS measured 10% window)
HDR
HDR10+ + HDR10
HDMI
4× HDMI 2.1
VRR
Yes
ALLM
Yes
Panel
Mini-LED
Size
65"
Refresh
120Hz
Release year
2024

Samsung S95F OLED

Pros
  • +QD-OLED Gen 4 with ~2,100 nit peak (RTINGS measured)
  • +165 Hz with full HDMI 2.1
  • +OneConnect Box keeps panel thin
Cons
  • No Dolby Vision (HDR10+ only)
  • Tizen OS slower than LG webOS
  • Expensive at 65″+

Sony BRAVIA 9 65"

Pros
  • +Strong HDR performance
  • +Current smart platform
  • +HDMI 2.1 on most HDMI ports
Cons
  • Ads on smart platform
  • Sound trails dedicated audio
  • Large footprint

FAQ: Samsung S95F OLED vs Sony BRAVIA 9 65"

Which is better, Samsung S95F OLED or Sony BRAVIA 9 65"? +

Sony BRAVIA 9 65" scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung S95F OLED worth the price? +

At $3,499, Samsung S95F OLED delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in motion.

Is Sony BRAVIA 9 65" worth the price? +

At $6,874, Sony BRAVIA 9 65" delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in picture.

Does Samsung S95F OLED or Sony BRAVIA 9 65" last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Samsung S95F OLED or Sony BRAVIA 9 65"? +

Samsung S95F OLED — leads on gaming (96 vs 91). Input lag, VRR, 120 Hz support.

Which is better for smart platform, Samsung S95F OLED or Sony BRAVIA 9 65"? +

Sony BRAVIA 9 65" — leads on smart (82 vs 80). OS speed, app support, ecosystem.