Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Sony FX3 · Body only — full-frame · 2021
Sony

Sony FX3 · Body only

full-frame · 2021

90
/ 100
From $3,898
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 5
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full-frame · 2024
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

full-frame · 2024

95
/ 100
From $4,299
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Sony FX3 · Body only lands at 90 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II at 95. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 5 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Sony FX3 · Body only if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (95 vs 90).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (93 vs 88).

Video

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the video sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on video (91 vs 86).

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Sony FX3 · Body only 90
vs
95 Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Score breakdown

Sony FX3 · Body only
90
photo 90
video 86
autofocus 88
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 95
video 91
autofocus 93
ergonomics 86

Specs side-by-side

Sony FX3 · Body only versus Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full spec comparison
Spec Sony FX3 · Body only Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Format
full-frame
full-frame
Release year
2021
2024

Sony FX3 · Body only

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

FAQ: Sony FX3 · Body only vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Which is better, Sony FX3 · Body only or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 5. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Sony FX3 · Body only worth the price? +

At $3,898, Sony FX3 · Body only delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in photo.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in photo.

Does Sony FX3 · Body only or Canon EOS R5 Mark II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Sony FX3 · Body only or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (95 vs 90). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Sony FX3 · Body only or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on autofocus (93 vs 88). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.