Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Xeon W9-3475X — Sapphire Rapids · 36C/72T · LGA4677
Intel

Xeon W9-3475X

Sapphire Rapids · 36C/72T · LGA4677

90
/ 100
From $3,739
VS
Apple M5 wins by 3
Apple M5 — 10C CPU · 10C GPU · 153 GB/s memory
Apple

Apple M5

10C CPU · 10C GPU · 153 GB/s memory

93
/ 100
From $1,299
Specdex verdict

Apple M5 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Xeon W9-3475X lands at 90 and Apple M5 at 93. That puts Apple M5 ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Xeon W9-3475X if…

  • ✓Massive core counts
  • ✓ECC memory support
  • ✓Workstation/server-grade platform

Pick Apple M5 if…

  • ✓10-core CPU (up to 4 performance + 6 efficiency)
  • ✓10-core GPU
  • ✓153 GB/s unified memory bandwidth
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Apple M5

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Apple M5 leads on single (100 vs 82).

Creators & productivity

Tie

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Power efficiency

Apple M5

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Apple M5 leads on efficiency (100 vs 78).

Value for money

Apple M5

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Apple M5 more score per dollar ($1,299 vs $3,739).

Xeon W9-3475X 90
vs
93 Apple M5

Score breakdown

Xeon W9-3475X
90
single 82
multi 90
gaming 70
efficiency 78
Apple M5
93
single 100
multi 90
gaming 78
efficiency 100

Specs side-by-side

Xeon W9-3475X versus Apple M5 — full spec comparison
Spec Xeon W9-3475X Apple M5
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
—
Cores
▲ 36
10 (up to 4P + 6E)
Threads
72
—
Socket
LGA4677
—
Release year
2023
2025
Memory bandwidth
—
153 GB/s
Neural engine
—
16-core
Process
—
TSMC 3 nm (3rd-generation)

Xeon W9-3475X

Pros
  • +Massive core counts
  • +ECC memory support
  • +Workstation/server-grade platform
Cons
  • −Niche platform, limited motherboards
  • −High TDP requires serious cooling
  • −Premium price

Apple M5

Pros
  • +10-core CPU (up to 4 performance + 6 efficiency)
  • +10-core GPU
  • +153 GB/s unified memory bandwidth
Cons
  • −Apple-ecosystem only
  • −Base tier starts at 16 GB
  • −Windows via Parallels only

FAQ: Xeon W9-3475X vs Apple M5

Which is better, Xeon W9-3475X or Apple M5? +

Apple M5 scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Xeon W9-3475X worth the price? +

At $3,739, Xeon W9-3475X delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in multi.

Is Apple M5 worth the price? +

At $1,299, Apple M5 delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in single.

Does Xeon W9-3475X or Apple M5 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Xeon W9-3475X or Apple M5? +

Apple M5 — leads on single (100 vs 82). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for power efficiency, Xeon W9-3475X or Apple M5? +

Apple M5 — leads on efficiency (100 vs 78). Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost.