Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Xeon W9-3495X — Sapphire Rapids · 56C/112T · LGA4677
Intel

Xeon W9-3495X

Sapphire Rapids · 56C/112T · LGA4677

92
/ 100
From $5,889
VS
Apple M4 Pro wins by 3
Apple M4 Pro — 14C CPU · 20C GPU · 273 GB/s
Apple

Apple M4 Pro

14C CPU · 20C GPU · 273 GB/s

95
/ 100
From $1,999
Specdex verdict

Apple M4 Pro takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Xeon W9-3495X lands at 92 and Apple M4 Pro at 95. That puts Apple M4 Pro ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Xeon W9-3495X if…

  • Massive core counts
  • ECC memory support
  • Workstation/server-grade platform

Pick Apple M4 Pro if…

  • Massive memory bandwidth
  • Silent under load
  • Excellent media engines
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Apple M4 Pro

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Apple M4 Pro leads on single (99 vs 84).

Creators & productivity

Tie

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Power efficiency

Apple M4 Pro

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Apple M4 Pro leads on efficiency (98 vs 78).

Value for money

Apple M4 Pro

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Apple M4 Pro more score per dollar ($1,999 vs $5,889).

Xeon W9-3495X 92
vs
95 Apple M4 Pro

Score breakdown

Xeon W9-3495X
92
single 84
multi 92
gaming 72
efficiency 78
Apple M4 Pro
95
single 99
multi 93
gaming 80
efficiency 98

Specs side-by-side

Xeon W9-3495X versus Apple M4 Pro — full spec comparison
Spec Xeon W9-3495X Apple M4 Pro
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
Cores
56
14 (10P+4E)
Threads
112
Socket
LGA4677
Release year
2023
GPU cores
20
Memory bandwidth
273 GB/s
Neural engine
16-core, 38 TOPS

Xeon W9-3495X

Pros
  • +Massive core counts
  • +ECC memory support
  • +Workstation/server-grade platform
Cons
  • Niche platform, limited motherboards
  • High TDP requires serious cooling
  • Premium price

Apple M4 Pro

Pros
  • +Massive memory bandwidth
  • +Silent under load
  • +Excellent media engines
Cons
  • Only in MacBook Pro 14/16 + Mac mini
  • Windows ARM is still niche
  • Premium

FAQ: Xeon W9-3495X vs Apple M4 Pro

Which is better, Xeon W9-3495X or Apple M4 Pro? +

Apple M4 Pro scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Xeon W9-3495X worth the price? +

At $5,889, Xeon W9-3495X delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in multi.

Is Apple M4 Pro worth the price? +

At $1,999, Apple M4 Pro delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in single.

Does Xeon W9-3495X or Apple M4 Pro last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Xeon W9-3495X or Apple M4 Pro? +

Apple M4 Pro — leads on single (99 vs 84). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for power efficiency, Xeon W9-3495X or Apple M4 Pro? +

Apple M4 Pro — leads on efficiency (98 vs 78). Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost.