Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
XPG MARS 980 BLADE — PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #17
XPG

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #17

83
/ 100
From $300
VS
Crucial MX500 2 TB wins by 1
Crucial MX500 2 TB — SATA · 560 MB/s · TLC
Crucial

Crucial MX500 2 TB

SATA · 560 MB/s · TLC

84
/ 100
From $119
Specdex verdict

Crucial MX500 2 TB takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, XPG MARS 980 BLADE lands at 83 and Crucial MX500 2 TB at 84. That puts Crucial MX500 2 TB ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick XPG MARS 980 BLADE if…

  • PassMark Disk Score top-20 (88,359) — sustained-write class-leading
  • Current street price around $721

Pick Crucial MX500 2 TB if…

  • Cheapest reliable 2 TB SATA SSD
  • 5-year warranty
  • Good for older laptops + secondary storage
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Crucial MX500 2 TB

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Crucial MX500 2 TB more score per dollar ($119 vs $300).

XPG MARS 980 BLADE 83
vs
84 Crucial MX500 2 TB

Score breakdown

XPG MARS 980 BLADE
83
ssd 83
passmark_disk 88359
speed 0
endurance 0
software 0
value 0
reliability 0
Crucial MX500 2 TB
84
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
speed 70
endurance 88
software 88
value 100
reliability 92

Specs side-by-side

XPG MARS 980 BLADE versus Crucial MX500 2 TB — full spec comparison
Spec XPG MARS 980 BLADE Crucial MX500 2 TB
Form factor
M.2 2280 (passive, heat-spreader label)
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
SATA III 6 Gb/s
Sequential read
14,000 MB/s
560 MB/s
Sequential write
13,000 MB/s
510 MB/s
Random read
2,000,000 IOPS
Random write
1,650,000 IOPS
Controller
Silicon Motion SM2508 (TSMC 6nm)
NAND
232-layer Micron 3D TLC
Micron 3D TLC
DRAM
yes (DRAM cache buffer)
Endurance
1,480 TBW
700 TBW (2TB)
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PassMark Disk Score
88,359
PassMark rank
#17 of 100 consumer SSDs
Capacity
500 GB / 1 / 2 / 4 TB

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Pros
  • +PassMark Disk Score top-20 (88,359) — sustained-write class-leading
  • +Current street price around $721
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes

Crucial MX500 2 TB

Pros
  • +Cheapest reliable 2 TB SATA SSD
  • +5-year warranty
  • +Good for older laptops + secondary storage
Cons
  • SATA bottleneck (560 MB/s ceiling)
  • TLC NAND
  • No NVMe option

FAQ: XPG MARS 980 BLADE vs Crucial MX500 2 TB

Which is better, XPG MARS 980 BLADE or Crucial MX500 2 TB? +

Crucial MX500 2 TB scores 84 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is XPG MARS 980 BLADE worth the price? +

At $300, XPG MARS 980 BLADE delivers a Specdex score of 83 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Is Crucial MX500 2 TB worth the price? +

At $119, Crucial MX500 2 TB delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in value.

Does XPG MARS 980 BLADE or Crucial MX500 2 TB last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, XPG MARS 980 BLADE or Crucial MX500 2 TB? +

Crucial MX500 2 TB — more score per dollar ($119 vs $300). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.