Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
XPG MARS 980 BLADE — PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #17
XPG

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #17

83
/ 100
From $300
VS
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB — 8TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,800 MB/s read · PassMark #19
Samsung

Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB

8TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,800 MB/s read · PassMark #19

83
/ 100
From $999
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, XPG MARS 980 BLADE lands at 83 and Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB at 83. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick XPG MARS 980 BLADE if…

  • PassMark Disk Score top-20 (88,359) — sustained-write class-leading
  • Current street price around $721

Pick Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB if…

  • PassMark Disk Score top-20 (87,709) — sustained-write class-leading
  • Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
  • PCIe 5.0 interface for next-gen platforms (AM5, LGA 1851)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

XPG MARS 980 BLADE more score per dollar ($300 vs $999).

XPG MARS 980 BLADE 83
vs
83 Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB

Score breakdown

XPG MARS 980 BLADE
83
ssd 83
passmark_disk 88359
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB
83
ssd 83
passmark_disk 87709

Specs side-by-side

XPG MARS 980 BLADE versus Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB — full spec comparison
Spec XPG MARS 980 BLADE Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB
Form factor
M.2 2280 (passive, heat-spreader label)
M.2 2280
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
Sequential read
14,000 MB/s
14,800 MB/s
Sequential write
13,000 MB/s
13,400 MB/s
Random read
2,000,000 IOPS
2,200,000 IOPS
Random write
1,650,000 IOPS
2,600,000 IOPS
Controller
Silicon Motion SM2508 (TSMC 6nm)
Samsung Presto (in-house, 5nm)
NAND
232-layer Micron 3D TLC
Samsung V8 V-NAND 3D TLC (236-layer)
DRAM
yes (DRAM cache buffer)
yes, LPDDR4X
Endurance
1,480 TBW
4,800 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PassMark Disk Score
88,359
87,709
PassMark rank
#17 of 100 consumer SSDs
#19 of 100 consumer SSDs

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Pros
  • +PassMark Disk Score top-20 (88,359) — sustained-write class-leading
  • +Current street price around $721
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes

Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB

Pros
  • +PassMark Disk Score top-20 (87,709) — sustained-write class-leading
  • +Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
  • +PCIe 5.0 interface for next-gen platforms (AM5, LGA 1851)
Cons
  • PCIe 5.0 drives run hot — heatsink or motherboard M.2 cooling recommended
  • Pricing varies — confirm current retail before purchase

FAQ: XPG MARS 980 BLADE vs Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB

Which is better, XPG MARS 980 BLADE or Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB? +

Both score 83 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is XPG MARS 980 BLADE worth the price? +

At $300, XPG MARS 980 BLADE delivers a Specdex score of 83 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Is Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB worth the price? +

At $999, Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB delivers a Specdex score of 83 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does XPG MARS 980 BLADE or Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, XPG MARS 980 BLADE or Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB? +

XPG MARS 980 BLADE — more score per dollar ($300 vs $999). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.